Advertisement
中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人辅助腹腔镜手术对胰十二指肠切除术患者生活质量及远期预后的效果分析

Effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the quality of life and long-term prognosis of patients

作者:李卓磊,王龙江

Vol. 6 No. 5 May. 2025 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2025.05.021 发布日期:2025-06-17
关键词:机器人辅助手术;胰十二指肠切除术;生活质量;远期预后

作者简介:

目的:探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜手术对胰十二指肠切除术患者生活质量及远期预后的效果。方法:选取 2017 年 6 月— 2020 年 8 月于某三甲医院行胰十二指肠切除手术的 60 例患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组(行达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜胰 十二指肠切除术,n=30)与对照组(行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术,n=30)。比较两组患者的手术情况、并发症发生情况、术 后 3 年生存率及生活质量。结果:观察组患者的手术情况均优于对照组,并发症总发生率低于对照组,术后 3 年生存率高于 对照组,术后 3 个月生活质量综合评定问卷评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术 能够有效促进患者术后恢复,降低并发症发生率,改善远期预后和生活质量水平,值得推广应用。

Objective: To explore the effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the quality of life and long-term prognosis of patients. Methods: 60 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary hospital from June 2017 to August 2020 were selected. They were randomly divided into the observation group (n=30, performing Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy) and the control group (n=30, performing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy). Surgical outcomes, complication rates, 3-year postoperative survival rates, and quality of life were compared between the two groups of patients. Results: The observation group showed superior surgical outcomes, lower total complication rate, higher 3-year postoperative survival rate, and better scores on the comprehensive quality of life at 3 months postoperatively compared to the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can effectively promote postoperative recovery, reduce complication incidence, improve long-term prognosis and quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

稿件信息

引用格式:李卓磊,王龙江 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜手术对胰十二指肠切除术患者生活质量及远期预后的效果分析 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2025,6(5):808-812. 

Citation: LI Z L, WANG L J. Effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the quality of life and long-term prognosis  of patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2025, 6(5): 808-812. 

通讯作者(Corresponding Author):李卓磊(LI Zhuolei),Email:491000253@qq.com

参考文献

[1] Choi S H. Usefulness of the new articulating laparoscopic instrument in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2022, 25(4): 161-164. 

[2] YANG X Y, ZHU K F, HU Q. An assessment of perioperative outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2023, 127(4): 752-754. 

[3] Uijterwijk B A, Lemmers D H L, Bolm L, et al. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic, robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: an international propensity score-matched cohort study[J]. Ann Surg, 2023, 278(3): e570-e579. 

[4] ZONG K, LUO K, CHEN K L, et al. A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a singlecenter experience[J]. Front Oncol, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960241. 

[5] GUO W, YE X F, LI J F, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes among open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study[J].BMC Surg, 2022, 22(1): 348. 

[6] Khachfe H H, Nassour I, Hammad A Y, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: increased adoption and improved outcomes-is laparoscopy still justified?[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 278(3): e563-e569. 

[7] Wach M M, Myneni A A, Miller L, et al. An assessment of perioperative outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in New York State[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2022, 126(8): 1434- 1441. 

[8] Choi M, Rho S Y, Kim S H, et al. Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(12): 8959-8966. 

[9] Lof S, Besselink M G, Abu Hilal M Author response to: risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study[J]. Br J Surg, 2022, 109(6): e82. 

[10] OUYANG L W, ZHANG J, FENG Q B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date system review and metaanalysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.834382. 

[11] Kim H, Choi S H, Jang J Y, et al. Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(3): 311-321. 

[12] 唐勇 , 施申超 , 柴楚星 , 等 . 机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术 治疗壶腹周围癌的临床对比研究 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2023, 4(2): 85-91. 

[13] CHENG K, WANG X, PENG B. Comment on: risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(11): e380. 

[14] Park S E, Choi H J, You Y K, et al. Effectiveness and stability of robotassisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2021, 100(6): 329-337. 

[15] Kalayarasan R, Gautham M S, Gnanasekaran S, et al. The technique of precise and systematic vascular control during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic tumours[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2021, 17(3): 399-404. 

[16] Lof S, Vissers F L, Klompmaker S, et al. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(1): 80-87. 

[17] 许永成 , 何兴龙 , 郭进 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人 "3+2" 模式在胰十二指 肠切除术胰肠吻合中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2023, 4(2): 92-98. 

[18] Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, et al. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Updates Surg, 2021, 73(3): 909-922. 

[19] XU D B, ZHAO Z M, XU Y, et al. Hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: a single-center experience in China[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(4): 1703-1712. 

[20] Kim H S, Kim H, Kwon W, et al. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/ staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(4): 1675-1681. 

[21] Gall T M, Pencavel T D, Cunningham D, et al. Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre-Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2020, 22(11): 1637-1644. 

[22] Kamarajah S K, Bundred J, Marc O S, et al. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and metaanalysis[J].Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(1): 6-14. 

[23] LIU M Q, JI S R, XU W Y, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: are the best times coming?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17(1): 81. 

[24] Chong E H, Choi S H. Hybrid laparoscopic and robotic hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(9): 1947-1948.

本期文章
[1] 达芬奇机器人手术专科护士培训的范围综述 [2] 3D 打印联合机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗儿童后肾腺瘤一例报道(附手术视频) [3] 手术室前瞻性护理策略在机器人辅助食管切除术中的应用效果 [4] 医护一体化护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术患者中的应用价值 [5] 信息共享基础上的家庭延续护理在机器人辅助脑胶质瘤手术中的应用效果 [6] 品管圈集束化护理模式在机器人辅助结直肠癌根治术围手术期中的应用 [7] ERAS 护理干预对机器人辅助结直肠癌根治术及造口术患者的影响 [8] 机器人辅助肺癌手术术后并发症单组率的 Meta 分析 [9] 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜在泌尿外科手术中的效果 [10] 品管圈活动在机器人手术器械管理中的应用效果 [11] 机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合原位新膀胱术在膀胱癌患者中的应用 [12] 3D 单孔胸腔镜在非小细胞肺癌手术中的应用及对患者术后恢复的影响 [13] 腹横肌平面阻滞联合舒芬太尼及布托啡诺静脉自控镇痛在 3D 腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用 [14] 机器人辅助腹腔镜手术对胰十二指肠切除术患者生活质量及远期预后的效果分析 [15] 基于泊松回归的机器人辅助结直肠癌手术并发症危险因素分析 [16] 完全机器人远端胃切除术治疗胃癌的临床效果研究(附手术视频) [17] 机器人辅助与全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺手术的疗效比较 [18] 人机协同一体化护理策略在机器人辅助腹腔镜下卵巢癌全面分期术手术室护理中的应用 [19] 整合性优化护理流程在机器人辅助腹腔镜下卵巢癌全面分期术患者手术室护理中的应用 [20] 机器人辅助输卵管吻合术临床病例分析(附手术视频) [21] 机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗腹膜后局限性复发妇科恶性肿瘤病灶 3 例报道(附手术视频) [22] 机器人辅助腹腔镜联合前哨淋巴结绘图在子宫内膜癌手术中的临床效果分析(附手术视频) [23] 安徽省内首例 5G 远程机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(附手术视频) [24] 国产手术机器人甲状腺与甲状旁腺手术围术期配合 [25] 国产机器人辅助腹腔镜下脐疝合并腹直肌分离修补术的手术配合 [26] 虚拟现实联合国产手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下中低位直肠癌根治术一例报道(附手术视频) [27] 经颅直流电刺激联合上肢机器人虚拟情景训练对脑卒中患者认知功能的影响 [28] 康复机器人联合间歇性有氧训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者步态控制及平衡能力的影响 [29] 神经康复机器人训练联合作业疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者肌力恢复效果及心理状况的影响 [30] 智能机器人步态模拟训练联合呼吸训练对脑卒中患者的影响 [31] 单孔机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的临床疗效对比 [32] 达芬奇 Xi 机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜在妇科阴道骶骨固定术中的应用 [33] 多臂机器人在单孔机器人辅助胸腔镜手术中的应用及进展 [34] 机器人辅助单孔与多孔腹腔镜技术在全子宫切除术中的应用(附手术视频)
印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈