目的：探讨 Da Vinci Xi 手术系统结合单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科盆底手术中的应用效果。方法：选取 2019 年 10 月 1 日— 2023 年 10 月 30 日西安国际医学中心医院妇科收治的 29 例盆腔器官脱垂患者为研究对象，所有患者行机器人辅助单孔腹腔 镜下阴道骶骨固定术。结果：29 例手术均顺利完成，手术时间 175~289 min，术中出血 20~160 mL，均未出现围手术期并发症， 无中转为开腹或多孔手术，患者结局良好。结论：达芬奇 Xi 机器人结合单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科盆腔脏器脱垂患者行阴道骶 骨固定术中具有微创、操作便利且术后恢复快等显著优势，可进行临床推广及应用。

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system combined with single-port laparoscopic techniques in gynecological pelvic floor surgery. Methods: 29 patients with pelvic organ prolapse who were treated at the Department of Gynecology in Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital from October 1, 2019 to October 30, 2023 were selected, they were all underwent robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Results: 29 procedures were all successfully completed, with an operative time of 175-289 min and intraoperative blood loss of 20-160 mL. No perioperative complications or conversions to open or multi-port surgery occurred, and all patients achieved favorable outcomes. Conclusion: The Da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system combined with single-port laparoscopic technique has significant advantages in sacrocolpopexy for gynecological patients with pelvic organ prolapse, including minimal invasiveness, easy operation, and rapid postoperative recovery, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

基金项目：陕西省 2023 年重点研发计划（2023-YBSF-223）；西安国际医学中心医院院级面上课题（2021MS001） 

Foundation Item: Key R&D Plan Project of Shaanxi Province in 2023(2023-YBSF-223); General Programme of Xi’an International Medical  Center Hospital (2021MS001) 

引用格式：尚莹莹，姚青青，逯蕾，等 . 达芬奇 Xi 机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜在妇科阴道骶骨固定术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文）， 2025，6（5）：714-718. 

Citation: SHANG Y Y, YAO Q Q, LU L, et al. Application of Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic surgery in gynecological  sacrocolpopexy [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2025, 6(5): 714-718. 

通讯作者（Corresponding Author）：王海琳（WANG Hailin），Email：Wanghailinyx@163.com

[1] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组 . 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治 指南 (2020 年版 )[J]. 中华妇产科杂志 , 2020, 55(5) : 300-306. 

[2] Handa V L, Garrett E, Hendrix S, et al. Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: a longitudinal study of menopausal women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 190(1): 27-32. 

[3] Coolen A W M, van Ijsselmuiden M N, van Oudheusden A M J, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2017, 17(1): 52. 

[4] Oliver J L, Kim J H. Robotic sacrocolpopexy-is it the treatment of choice for advanced apical pelvic organ prolapse?[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2017, 18(9): 66. 

[5] Boruta D M. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: an update[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 141(3): 616-623. 

[6] 周星楠 , 符华影 , 刘娟 . 单孔腹腔镜在妇科盆底手术中的应用 [J]. 实 用妇产科杂志 , 2019, 35(3): 172-174. 

[7] Koythong T, Thigpen B, Sunkara S, et al. Surgical outcomes of hysterectomy via robot-assisted versus traditional transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(12): 2028-2035. 

[8] Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Climacteric, 2019, 22(3): 229-235. 

[9] Matthews C A, Geller E J, Henley B R, et al. Permanent compared with absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 136(2): 355-364. 

[10] Reisenauer C, Andress J, Schoenfisch B, et al. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022, 33(2): 411-419. 

[11] Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 7(7): CD012376. 

[12] Di Marco D S, Chow G K, Gettman M T, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse[J]. Urology, 2004, 63(2): 373-376. 

[13] 郭楠 , 倪观太 , 丁锦 , 等 , 经脐单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿手术 [J]. 中国微 创外科杂志 , 2019, 19(6): 515-517, 522. 

[14] Navarrete Arellano M, Garibay González F. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery: prospective series of 186 pediatric surgeries[J]. Front Pediatr, 2019. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00200. 

[15] Matanes E, Lauterbach R, Boulus S, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.006. 

[16] Uccella S, Casarin J, Marconi N, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy for benign disease in women with giant uteri (>/=1500 g): feasibility and outcomes[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23(6): 922- 927. 

[17] Stewart K I, Fader A N. New developments in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 60(2): 330- 348. 

[18] 齐金红 , 袁勇 , 冯文娟 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人在妇科手术应用中的安全 性评价 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2021. 2(2): 111-122. 

[19] MEI H, TANG S T. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives[J]. Front Pediatr, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831. 

[20] Mizuno K, Kojima Y, Nishio H, et al. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology: current status[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2018, 11(4): 308-317. 

[21] Yeung J, Crisp C C, Mazloomdoost D, et al. Liposomal bupivacaine during robotic colpopexy and posterior repair: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 131(1): 39-46. 

[22] Gallotta V, Giudice M T, Conte C, et al. Minimally invasive salvage lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer patients: a single institution series[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(10): 1568-1572. 

[23] Moukarzel L A, Sinno A K, Fader A N.Comparing single-site and multiport robotic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: surgical outcomes and cost analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(6): 977-983. 

[24] Prodromidou A, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 14(5): 679-686. 

[25] Geoffrion R, Larouche M. Guideline No. 413: surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse in women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2021, 43(4): 511-523. 

[26] 田东立 , 李丰鑫 , 窦磊 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人系统在肥胖患者手术中的 应用优势——附 1 例病例分析 [J]. 妇产与遗传 ( 电子版 ), 2019, 9(2): 30-32. 

[27] Kampers J, Gerhardt E, Sibbertsen P, et al.Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 304(3): 577-587. 

[28] Matanes E, Lauterbach R, Mustafa-Mikhail S, et al.Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: our experience with the first 25 cases[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2017, 23(3): e14-e18. 

[29] Liu J, Bardawil E, Zurawin R K, et al. Robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy with retroperitoneal tunneling[J]. JSLS, 2018, 22(3): e2018.00009. 

[30] Campagna G, Vacca L, Panico G, et al. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022, 33(2): 359- 368. 

[31] Corrado G, Cutillo G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 27(4): e39.