机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫内膜癌手术并发症的研究进展

摘要/Abstract

子宫内膜癌是常见的女性生殖系统恶性肿瘤，其治疗方式以手术为主。机器人手术系统作为一种微创手术，近年来在妇科手术领域迅速发展，目前已在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中广泛应用。机器人辅助腹腔镜手术相比于传统腹腔镜手术具有手术视野更清晰真实、操作精准度更高等优势，尤其对于子宫内膜癌合并肥胖甚至重度肥胖的手术患者，其优势更加突出。机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床优势已得到认可，其手术并发症也逐渐受到重视。本研究总结机器人系统及传统腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌手术并发症相关的研究进展。

Endometrial cancer is a common malignant tumor in female reproductive system, the common way to treat it is surgery. As a kind of minimally invasive surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been developed rapidly in gynecological surgery in recent years, which has been widely used in the surgical treatment on endometrial cancer. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has a clearer and more real view, which can make surgeons perform operation more precisely, especially for patients with endometrial cancer combined with obesity and even severe obesity. The clinical advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer have been recognized, and its surgical complications have gradually been paid attention to. This paper mainly summarizes the advances in the study of surgical complications in treating endometrial carcinoma with robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy.

稿件信息

参考文献

[1] Siege R L, Millr K D, Jemal A.Cancer statistics, 2017 [J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2017, 67 (1): 7-30.

[2] Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A.Colorectol cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64 (2): 104- 117.

[3] Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al.ESMO-ESGOESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27 (1): 16-41.

[4] Vuorinen R K, Mäenpä M M, Nieminen K, et al.Costs of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy in endometrial Cancer[J]. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Official Journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2017, 27 (8): 1788-1793.

[5] Childers J M, Surwit E A.Combined laparoscopic and vaginal surgery for the management of two cases of stage I endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1992, 45 (1): 46-51.

[6] Walker J L, Piedmonte M R, Spirtos N M, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (32): 5331-5336.

[7] Wollinga T, Ezendam NPM, Eggink F A, et al. Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer over the past decade[J]. Gynecol Surg, 2018, 15 (1): 7-15.

[8] Mendivil A A, Rettenmaier M A, Abaid L N, et al.A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients[J]. JSLS, 2015, 19 (1): e2014.00001.

[9] Oyama K, Kanno K, Kojima R, et al.short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoseopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45 (2): 405-411.

[10] CHEN C H, CHIU L H, CHEN H H, et al.Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2016, 12 (2): 268-275.

[11] Nezhat F R, Datta M S, Liu C, et al.Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer[J]. JSLS, 2008, 12 (3): 227-237.

[12] Sinno A K, Fader A N.Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102 (4): 922-932.

[13] Park H K, Helenowski I B, Berry E, et al.A comparison of survival and recurrence outcomes in patients with endometiral cancer undergoing robotic versus open surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22 (6): 961-967.

[14] Shemshedini T, Pradhan T S, Pua T L, et al.The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in genecologic oncology[J]. J Robot Surg, 2015, 9 (2): 109-116.

[15] Krstensen S E, Mosgaard B J, Rosendahl M, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology: Current status and controversies on patient benefits, cost and surgeon conditions-a systematic review[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96 (3): 274-285.

[16] Yim G W, Sang W K, Nam E J, et al.Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution[J]. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2013, 24 (4): 303-312.

[17] Corrado G, Gutillo G, Pomati G, et al.Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41 (8): 1074-1081.

[18] Ind T E, Marshall C, Hacking M, et al.Introducting robotic surgery into an endometrial cancer service-a prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in a UK institution[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2016, 12 (1): 137-144.

[19] Chiou H Y, Chiu L H, Chen C H, et al.Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: a cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015.

[20] Mäenpä M M, Nieminen K, Tomás E I, et al.Roboticassisted versus traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 215 (2): 1-7.

[21] Madhuri T K, Butler-Manuel S. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 216 (6): 619.

[0]	脊柱手术机器人在脊柱外科手术中的应用进展
[1]	达芬奇机器人手术系统在肝切除手术中的应用
[2]	达芬奇机器人辅助下巨大子宫切除的研究进展
[3]	机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫内膜癌手术并发症的研究进展
[4]	达芬奇机器人在妇科手术应用中的安全性评价
[5]	达芬奇机器人用于妇科手术的技术评价
[6]	达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜系统在术后盆腔粘连预防与治疗中的应用
[7]	机器人手术系统在女性梗阻性生殖道畸形中的应用